ELECTORAL INTEGRITY BROKEN PROMISES ACT 2025

  SHOULD THE ELECTORATE BE LIED TO EVERY TIME THERE IS A GENERAL ELECTION, OR SHOULD THEY BE ABLE TO EXPECT THAT CAMPAIGN PROMISES WILL BE ADHERED TO AND THAT THE PARTY AND MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT MAKING THEM, HAVE A REASONABLE PROSPECT OF IMPLEMENTING THEM. WE PROPOSES A NEW BILL FOR PARLIAMENT TO GIVE THE PEOPLE THE RIGHT TO PETITION KING CHARLES III FOR DISSOLUTION OF PARLIAMENT IF MORE THAN 100,000 REGISTERED VOTERS ASK FOR A NEW GOVERNMENT, TO INCUDE INVESTIGATION OF MPS AND SUSPENSION OF THOSE FOUND TO BE GUILTY OF ELECTIONEERING.

Please use our A-Z INDEX to navigate this site or visit our HOMEPAGE

When does a political party's actions define what colour they really are? And when should politician be prosecuted for making blatantly fraudulent promises? The last total bullshit merchant was Boris Johnson, the Clown of Europe, with his Big Red Bus campaign and Brexit promises. He even lied to Queen Elizabeth II about proroguing Parliament.  

You may remember their promises last year in 2024. "No, please vote for Labour and we won't increase taxes. We're really lovely people, all soft and cuddly. Your savings and inheritances are safe with us."  "Just vote for us, so that once we have our feet under the table, we can then do everything we promised voters we would not do. That's just politics isn't it? There is no law against that. Suckers!"

No Rachel, voters want politicians they can trust. They don't like being lied to.

Surely it is time for Statute that prevents political candidates from misleading the electorate. To enhance standards for those in public life. And to punish those who deceive, with intention to attain positions of trust. And in this case, ruin the economy. Driving down the value of what little they have left you. As you shuffle around the home you can no longer afford to heat.

If this was Nazi Germany, Rachel might have been put against a wall and shot for treason, if she'd lied to der Fuhrer. As things stand, there is a Petition with some 3,043,304 signatures (a time of writing), calling for a general election. Which in the modern world amounts to the same thing as a firing squad.

Voters do not like being lied to!

Where the Conservatives also have no ideas, other than to keep building unaffordable houses for their rich chums to rent to benefits claimants, which your council has to pay for, and thus needs to raise taxes, because they failed to secure the build of any sustainable housing, that the nation desperately needs. After Maggie Thatcher allowed social housing stocks to be sold off, without requiring councils to replace them.

ADOLF - In the eyes of many looking on at the antics of Vladimir Putin, there is an inescapable similarity between the Russian president, effectively a dictator, and the former German chancellor. We are also reminded of Sussex Police, who also beat up prisoners who are asserting their rights to a fair hearing, and when they don't get that, an effective remedy. The United Kingdom is rife with human rights abuses that fall far short of Putin's Russia, but nevertheless, are serious issue on our radar. Just like Rachel, Hitler lied to his electorate. Once he got into power, he made his word law. It took a world war to see the bastard out of office in May of 1945. The dictator finally shot himself. Reeves may well shoot herself. Only metaphorically speaking, in the foot.

DRAFT BILL: THE PARLIAMENTARY SAFEGUARDS ACCOUNTABILITY & ELECTORAL INTEGRITY ACT 2025

Title: This Act may be cited as the Parliamentary Safeguard Accountability and Electoral Integrity Act 2025.

Preamble: Whereas it is recognized that the electorate has the right to fair and honest representation, and to hold their elected officials accountable for the promises made during election campaigns, this Act establishes provisions to dissolve Parliament and call a general election under specific circumstances of unfulfilled electoral promises.

WHEREAS the integrity of the democratic process relies on elected officials honoring their commitments to the electorate; and

WHEREAS the betrayal of electoral promises undermines public trust in government and erodes the foundations of representative democracy; and

WHEREAS the current mechanisms for holding elected officials accountable are insufficient to address systemic breaches of electoral pledges;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED by the King's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 

1. Interpretation:

In this Act: 

(a) "Electoral Pledge" means a specific promise made by a political party in its published manifesto or by a candidate during an election campaign that is capable of being objectively verified.

(b) "Material Breach" means a significant and demonstrable failure by the government to implement an Electoral Pledge within a reasonable timeframe, taking into account the resources available and any unforeseen circumstances.

(c) "Petition" means a formal request signed by at least 200,000 registered electors of the United Kingdom.

2. Dissolution of Parliament:

(1) If a petition alleging a Material Breach of Electoral Pledge(s) by the government is presented to the Head of State, supported by evidence deemed sufficient by an independent Electoral Integrity Commission established under section 3, the Head of State shall dissolve Parliament.

(2) Upon the dissolution of Parliament under this section, a general election shall be held within 90 days.

3. Electoral Integrity Commission:

(1) There shall be established an independent Electoral Integrity Commission, composed of five or more members appointed by each political party having either Members of Parliament, or a majority of Councillors to control a District or County Council, to be validated by the Speaker of the House of Commons, ensuring representation from diverse backgrounds and bringing with them a necessary qualification in administrative and constitutional law, economics, and public policy.

(2) The Commission shall:

(a) Receive and assess petitions alleging Material Breaches of Electoral Pledges.
(b) Conduct investigations into such allegations, including the power to compel evidence and testimony.
(c) Determine whether a Material Breach has occurred, publishing its findings with reasons.
(d) Establish and maintain a publicly accessible database of Electoral Pledges made by political parties and candidates.

4. Any individual or organization found to have deliberately submitted a false petition shall be subject to penalties, including fines and disqualification from participating in future elections.

5. Legal Recourse:

This Act does not create any new individual legal rights or remedies for breach of electoral promises beyond the petition process outlined in this Act.

6. Amendment and Repeal:

This Act may only be amended or repealed by a vote of [Supermajority, e.g., two-thirds] of the members of the House of Commons.

7. Commencement:

7.1 This Act shall come into force upon receiving Royal Assent.

7.2 The provisions of this Act apply to all political parties and Members of Parliament elected after the Act's commencement.

Explanatory Note:

This Bill aims to enhance electoral accountability by providing a mechanism for the dissolution of Parliament in cases of significant breaches of electoral promises. The independent Electoral Integrity Commission will play a crucial role in assessing petitions and determining whether such breaches have occurred. This legislation seeks to restore public trust in the democratic process and ensure that elected officials are held responsible for their commitments to the electorate.

DISSOLUTION OF PARLIAMENT 

A Prime Minister can call a general election at a time of their choosing by requesting a dissolution of Parliament from the Sovereign within the five-year life of a Parliament. The Government was elected by the British people on a mandate of change at the July 2024 general election. Not a recipe for more borrowing and higher taxation to pay for it.

This Government claims to be fixing the foundations and delivering change with investment and reform to deliver growth, with more jobs, more money in people’s pockets, to rebuild Britain and get the NHS back on its feet. They claimed this would be built on the strong foundations of a stable economy, national security and secure borders as we put politics back in the service of working people. What happened. Were they asleep when in opposition?

On entering office, a £22 billion black hole was identified in the nation’s finances - in reality a £200 billion pound black hole requiring slimming down all social and civil services, mainly to call a halt to poor performance from working from home.

Labour inherited all the usual challenges, with crumbling public services and crippled public finances, but said they'd deliver a decade of national renewal through Five missions: 

1. economic growth, 

2. fixing the NHS, 

3. safer streets, 

4. making Britain a clean energy super-power and 

5. opportunity for all. 

We only count four promises, we don't see how Labour can manufacture "opportunities for all". Unless, paying more to live is spun around to be an "opportunity." And so far in February 2025, they have failed to deliver on any of these promises.

The Government’s first Budget caused mass migrations of millionaires who could see the writing on the wall.

The so-called budget head room was soon exhausted, leading to more borrowing at higher interest rates than before. Meaning, the UK has borrowed more than it can afford to pay back.

The burning question is, will this lame-duck Government continue to lie to the electorate, invent more taxes and claw back more pensioner's savings, and legacies. We cannot see any light at the end of the tunnel.

Except for ReformUK.

What do you think? And perhaps next time, we need to think harder before voting.

https://www.

THE PLAYERS HEADING IN 2025

Is Rachel Reeves the new Margaret Thatcher? Well done old gal! The only Labour politician who seems to have a viable agenda is Angela Rayner. But even she is struggling with ways to get her affordable homes built. At least, she keeps fumbling the ball in interviews, that would not be necessary if she followed our lead with new laws to force councils to abandon their evil renting society, empire building ways. Where council taxes are higher and people cannot afford high rents from their fat-cat landlords.

The so-called Labour Party is not representing the workers at all. They are supporting administration jobs where those in these roles of trust are doing nothing at all, except invent problems that cost the tax payer even more. Heaven forbid we should actually promote Britain's heritage, creative writers, film makers and most of all the farmers and fishermen who keep us fed. As to water, well that is another issue, for sure selling off our utilities was one of the worst mistakes old Conservative Maggie ever did. More selling British workers into slavery. In the UK, the rich get rich by exploiting the workforce, using battalions of surveillance administrators at a ratio of 4 seat polishers to every 1 productive worker. The system is geared to draining every last ounce of blood from their victims via taxes. It is like one vast concentration camp, where the guards outnumber the inmates 4:1

European Court of Human Rights The International Court of Human Rights Adolf Hitler World War Three

Adolf Hitler and chum They are proponents of the Renting Age and Financial Slavery, as part of their kleptocratic agendas - not that far removed from Putin's vision where Russia dominates the world, supported by allied nations. Until, the final conflict, when there can be only one. And it will not be China that comes out on top. Though, many think they have commercial domination plans of their own.

In Wealdenland, they have been building executive houses to enable Russian oligarchs and other drug dealers and oil barons to launder their money. It appears not to bother this council's conscience one little bit. Just so long as they get a fat pension, by investing in oil and gas companies. To date, .

LINKS & REFERENCE

 Copyright © Injustice Alliance 2025. This website is protected by Articles 9 and 10 of the European Convention, and Articles 18 and 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Injustice Alliance avers that the right to impart information is a right, no matter that the method of communication is unpalatable to the State.