KIER STARMER'S 4:1 RATIO PENSION BLACK HOLE

  THE VERY BRITISH GESTAPO REGIME CARRIES A 4:1 RATIO OF NON PRODCUTIVE CIVIL SERVANTS, COUNCILS AND MP'S FOR EVERY ONE WORKER IN A SURVEILLANCE POLICE STATE ADOLF HITLER WOULD BE PROUD OF - FIVE PENSIONS PER WORKER IN THE UNITED KINGDOM

Please use our A-Z INDEX to navigate this site or visit our HOMEPAGE

The so-called Labour Party is not representing the workers at all. They are supporting administration jobs where those in these roles of trust are doing nothing at all, except invent problems that cost the tax payer even more. Heaven forbid we should actually promote Britain's heritage, creative writers, film makers and most of all the farmers and fishermen who keep us fed. As to water, well that is another issue, for sure selling off our utilities was one of the worst mistakes old Conservative Maggie ever did. More selling British workers into slavery.

MSN GB NEWS 7 DECEMBER 2024 - 'THEY FEEL A SENSE OF BETRAYAL!' STARMER FACES CIVIL SERVICE REVOLT AFTER PM ACCUSED OF CHANNELING INNER TRUMP

Keir Starmer is facing fierce backlash from civil service unions after criticising Whitehall culture in a speech at Pinewood Studios.

The Prime Minister sparked controversy by suggesting that "too many people in Whitehall are comfortable in the tepid bath of managed decline".

Starmer's remarks, delivered during an address aimed at resetting his premiership, have prompted angry responses from union leaders who represent civil service staff.

In his speech, Starmer distanced himself from drastic reform, stating: "I don't think there's a swamp to be drained here."

However, he went on to criticise what he saw as a lack of ambition in Whitehall, paraphrasing JFK by saying "you choose change not because it's easy but because it's hard."

The Labour leader expressed frustration at what he perceived as an overly cautious approach, claiming officials "don't say anything, don't try anything too ambitious, set targets that will happen anyway."

FDA union leader Dave Penman expressed outrage accusing Starmer of betraying civil servants' trust.

"I don't think the PM understands how damaging his words have been. I think they feel a sense of betrayal," Penman told the BBC.

He particularly criticised Starmer's choice of rhetoric, stating: "Here we are five months in with that Trumpian language that's getting used."

Penman added that Starmer could have highlighted "the incredible work the civil service does" instead of focusing on decline.

Steve Thomas, deputy general secretary of Prospect union, warned against scapegoating civil servants for policy failures. [who else is there to blame, they draft our legislation]

"Reform may well be necessary, indeed civil service unions have been saying for years that we stand ready to work with the Government," he said. [When? The National Debt has been increasing for years - hence - managed decline]

Thomas called for addressing the "unmanaged decline" in parts of the civil service through pay reforms to compete with the private sector.

In response, Starmer promised "a profound cultural shift away from a declinist mentality" in his policy document.

The Conservative response came from party leader Kemi Badenoch, who seized on Starmer's speech as evidence of Labour's shortcomings.

Badenoch characterised the address as an "emergency reset" of Starmer's premiership.

She suggested that Labour had not been "ready for government" when it won the general election in July.

Starmer's remarks yesterday also led some to reference Boris Johnson's former right-hand man Dominic Cummings.

Cummings, who left Downing Street after losing a power-struggle with Johnson's partner Carrie, was keen to dismantle to so-called "Blob" to increase efficiency in Whitehall.

Responding to the comparison, the ex-Vote Leave mastermind said: "Wasn't expecting 'Cummings was right' to be the relaunch news but interesting McSweeney's team figured it out in weeks and the brain dead Tories couldn't in 25 years."

He added: "Years late but directionally good to see BBC headline: 'Cummings was right!'

"Shame MPs will spend years more smashing the country up instead of smashing the Northcote-Trevelyan permanent bureaucracy that knackered the country.

"As Eurozone/EU shitshow intensifies won't be long before the BBC runs headline: Brexit was right."

ADOLF - In the eyes of many looking on at the antics of Vladimir Putin, there is an inescapable similarity between the Russian president, effectively a dictator, and the former German chancellor. We are also reminded of Sussex Police, who also beat up prisoners who are asserting their rights to a fair hearing, and when they don't get that, an effective remedy. The United Kingdom is rife with human rights abuses that fall far short of Putin's Russia, but nevertheless, are serious issue on our radar. MPs and Councillors just attend meetings and talk a lot. Then they have meetings to discuss what was said at other meetings. It is a job creation scheme for people who talk a lot of hot air, but actually do nothing.

Q. We wondered in the UK, how many productive citizens, like agricultural farmers, fishermen, house builders, factory workers and ship and car makers there might be out of the 68 million inhabitants, versus non-productive workers, like civil servants, members of parliament and local council staff. We wondered what the ratio might be? Not including retired people, children and students, who do not work for a living.

A. In the UK, the workforce is distributed across various sectors. Here's a breakdown:

- Agriculture: Approximately 1% of the workforce

- Manufacturing: Around 18% of the workforce

- Services: About 80% of the workforce

Given these percentages, out of 60 million inhabitants (excluding retired people, children, and students), we can estimate:

Productive citizens (agricultural farmers, fishermen, house builders, factory workers, ship and car makers): Roughly 19% (1% in agriculture + 18% in manufacturing)

Non-productive workers (civil servants, members of parliament, local council staff): Roughly 81% (80% in services + 1% in other non-productive roles)

So, the ratio of productive to non-productive workers would be approximately 1:4.

Sir Keir Starmer - Prime Minister

THE CLASS SYSTEM - In the UK, the rich get rich by exploiting the workforce, using battalions of surveillance administrators at a ratio of 4 seat polishers to every 1 productive worker. The system is geared to draining every last ounce of blood from their victims via taxes. It is like one vast concentration camp, where the guards outnumber the inmates 4:1

Here is a rough guide on how many productive citizens there might be out of the 68 million + inhabitants in UK:

Estimated ratio of productive to non-productive workers in UK by category numbers in millions:

a) Productive workers 12.6 million

b) Non-productive workers 47.4 million

The definition of "productive" and "non-productive" work can be subjective. Many jobs that are not directly involved in producing goods or services can still be important for the economy and society as a whole. The UK workforce is constantly changing. The numbers of people in different occupations can fluctuate over time.

GENERAL INFORMATION

- The UK population is approximately 68 million people.

- The working-age population (16-64 years old) is around 34 million people.

- The UK has a diverse economy with various sectors, including manufacturing, construction, agriculture, and services.

- The UK government employs a significant number of civil servants, but they also contribute to the economy by providing essential services.

RESOURCES

1. Office for National Statistics (ONS): The ONS is the UK's national statistics office and provides a wealth of data on the UK economy, labor market, and population. You can find detailed information on employment rates, industry sectors, and government spending on their website.

2. Department for Work and Pensions (DWP): The DWP is responsible for welfare benefits and employment support in the UK. They publish statistics on employment rates, unemployment rates, and job vacancies.

for the economy's functioning. For example, teachers, nurses, and civil servants provide essential services.
Future of Work: The rise of AI and automation is likely to transform the job market. While some jobs may become obsolete, new opportunities will emerge.

Nazi death camp executions. Direct action killing of humans inconvenient to their cleansing and world domination agenda was a World War Two horror exemplified by the factory gassing of concentration camp inmates. Putin's Russia is not that different, when push comes to shove. Effectively, this is what Russia is doing to Ukrainians at the moment.

If social injustice leads to crime, then building more prisons is surely a sign that government policies are not working.

THE PLAYERS HEADING INTO 2025

....

European Court of Human Rights The International Court of Human Rights Adolf Hitler World War Three

Adolf Hitler and chum They are proponents of the Renting Age and Financial Slavery, as part of their kleptocratic agendas - not that far removed from Putin's vision where Russia dominates the world, supported by allied nations. Until, the final conflict, when there can be only one. And it will not be China that comes out on top. Though, many think they have commercial domination plans of their own.

In Wealdenland, they have been building executive houses to enable Russian oligarchs and other drug dealers and oil barons to launder their money. It appears not to bother this council's conscience one little bit. Just so long as they get a fat pension, by investing in oil and gas companies. To date, no British prime minister has made any effort to close the legal loopholes that have allowed the United Kingdom to become the money laundering capital of the world.

LINKS & REFERENCE

 Copyright © Injustice Alliance 2024. This website is protected by Articles 9 and 10 of the European Convention, and Articles 18 and 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Injustice Alliance avers that the right to impart information is a right, no matter that the method of communication is unpalatable to the State.